edgenat成立于2019年，主打适合建站用途的香港CN2云服务器、韩国CN2云服务器及美国CN2高防云服务器，2021年edgenat云服务器最新促销活动主机玖玖在edgenat云服务器2021年最新终身6折促销(香港CN2/韩国CN2/美国CN2高防可选)文章当中做了介绍，edgenat云服务器全场月付7折、年付6折起，并且均为终身续费折扣！就拿edgenat韩国云服务器2核2G内存的最低配置来说，月付42元、年付只需360元，用来建站成本是比较低的，并且是三网回程CN2 GIA线路有效保障了电信、联通、移动三网的访问速度。
前面主机玖玖在edgenat月付42元起的美国洛杉矶CN2 100G高防云服务器速度及性能测评文章当中对edgenat美国CN2高防云服务器的速度及综合性能进行了测评。但是如果不考虑防御，单纯的考虑电信、联通、移动三网访问速度来说的话，edgenat韩国云服务器是远远要好于美国CN2高防云服务器速度测。因为韩国在地理位置就有优势！那么edgenat韩国云服务器速度及性能怎么样？这里博客也趁着促销活动拿下了一款8核8G内存4M带宽无限流量的云服务器方案，一起来看看edgenat韩国云服务器测评结果。
一、edgenat韩国CN2云服务器方案整理
edgenat韩国CN2云服务器为韩国首尔LG机房，BGP线路，三网回程CN2 GIA优化，速度方面可以媲美香港BGP带宽，并且在晚高峰稳定性要略好于香港BGP！所以博客也入手了一台目前正在促销的韩国CN2云服务器特惠方案。目前edgenat韩国云服务器8核8G内存是特惠配置，同样可以享受月付7折、年付6折的活动，折后月付112元/月、年付更为划算只需960元。
- 韩国测试IP：103.145.106.*
- 月付终身7折优惠码：XNKL
- 年付终身6折优惠码：NNKL
| CPU | 內存 | SSD | IPv4/峰值带宽/流量 | 价格 | 链接 |
| 2核 | 2G | 20G | 1个IP/2Mbps/无限 | 42元/月起 | 點擊直連 |
| 2核 | 4G | 40G | 1个IP/2Mbps/无限 | 56元/月 | 點擊直連 |
| 4核 | 4G | 50G | 1个IP/3Mbps/无限 | 70元/月 | 點擊直連 |
| 4核 | 8G | 50G | 1个IP/4Mbps/无限 | 105元/月 | 點擊直連 |
| 8核 | 8G | 50G | 1个IP/4Mbps/无限 | 112元/月 |
點擊直連 |
| 8核 | 16G | 70G | 1个IP/5Mbps/无限 | 210元/月 | 點擊直連 |
二、edgenat韩国CN2云服务器速度及综合性能测评
1、edgenat韩国CN2云服务器ping测试结果。电信、联通、移动三网平均延迟在60毫秒以内，其中电信、联通最为优异。三网最高延迟均在100毫秒以内，稳定性较好。
2、edgenat韩国CN2云服务器带宽抖动及丢包测试。测试节点的电信、联通、移动三网无丢包现象，稳定性也是非常好的，绿色基本都是直线条。
3、edgenat韩国CN2云服务器电信、联通、移动及亚太节点上行、下行带宽速度测试。博主开通的配置是4Mbps上行带宽，测试节点基本可以跑满、下行分配30Mbps带宽也能跑满。
4、edgenat韩国CN2云服务器回程路由追踪测试。
电信去程CN2直连。
联通去程直连。
移动去程直连。
5、edgenat韩国CN2云服务器去程路由追踪测试。北京电信回程CN2直连、北京联通回程骨干直连、北京移动回程直连。
Traceroute to China, Beijing CU (TCP Mode, Max 30 Hop) ============================================================ traceroute to 123.125.99.1 (123.125.99.1), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets 1 103.145.106.1 1.56 ms AS133441 Republic of Korea Seoul sihouwen.com 2 10.1.254.6 4.06 ms * LAN Address 3 10.1.254.2 1.65 ms * LAN Address 4 172.20.15.6 0.87 ms * LAN Address 5 121.189.3.73 1.09 ms AS4766 Republic of Korea Seoul kt.com 6 112.174.89.94 9.08 ms AS4766 KT.COM BACKBONE kt.com 7 219.158.40.85 47.98 ms AS4837 China Shanghai ChinaUnicom 8 219.158.113.118 48.58 ms AS4837 China Shanghai ChinaUnicom 9 219.158.113.101 44.89 ms AS4837 China Shanghai ChinaUnicom 10 219.158.6.169 46.31 ms AS4837 China Beijing ChinaUnicom 11 * 12 219.232.11.134 43.54 ms AS4808 China Beijing ChinaUnicom 13 124.65.194.134 45.95 ms AS4808 China Beijing ChinaUnicom 14 61.135.113.158 54.81 ms AS4808 China Beijing ChinaUnicom 15 * 16 * 17 123.125.99.1 49.19 ms AS4808 China Beijing ChinaUnicom Traceroute to China, Beijing CT (TCP Mode, Max 30 Hop) ============================================================ traceroute to 180.149.128.1 (180.149.128.1), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets 1 103.145.106.1 1.58 ms AS133441 Republic of Korea Seoul sihouwen.com 2 10.1.254.6 4.85 ms * LAN Address 3 10.1.254.2 1.93 ms * LAN Address 4 10.1.255.2 1.22 ms * LAN Address 5 172.20.15.8 0.95 ms * LAN Address 6 103.198.144.73 1.16 ms AS64050 Republic of Korea Seoul bgp.net 7 103.198.144.41 1.65 ms AS64050 Republic of Korea Seoul bgp.net 8 103.198.144.70 2.66 ms AS64050 Republic of Korea Seoul bgp.net 9 203.195.115.21 1.91 ms AS4809 Republic of Korea Seoul ChinaTelecom 10 59.43.247.41 24.41 ms * China Shanghai ChinaTelecom 11 59.43.247.101 46.66 ms * China Beijing ChinaTelecom 12 * 13 59.43.132.13 46.77 ms * China Beijing ChinaTelecom 14 * 15 36.110.244.46 51.29 ms AS23724 China Beijing ChinaTelecom 16 180.149.128.1 57.87 ms AS23724 China Beijing ChinaTelecom Traceroute to China, Beijing CM (TCP Mode, Max 30 Hop) ============================================================ traceroute to 211.136.25.153 (211.136.25.153), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets 1 103.145.106.1 2.10 ms AS133441 Republic of Korea Seoul sihouwen.com 2 10.1.254.6 4.92 ms * LAN Address 3 10.1.254.2 1.81 ms * LAN Address 4 172.20.15.6 0.89 ms * LAN Address 5 103.198.144.50 35.96 ms AS64050 China Hong Kong bgp.net 6 103.198.146.102 36.38 ms AS64050 China Hong Kong bgp.net 7 * 8 223.120.2.53 38.17 ms AS58453 China Hong Kong ChinaMobile 9 * 10 * 11 * 12 * 13 221.176.21.229 74.79 ms AS9808 China Beijing ChinaMobile 14 111.24.2.105 81.91 ms AS9808 China Beijing ChinaMobile 15 111.24.14.54 84.52 ms AS9808 China Beijing ChinaMobile 16 * 17 * 18 211.136.63.66 90.38 ms AS56048 China Beijing ChinaMobile 19 * 20 * 21 * 22 * 23 211.136.25.153 83.90 ms AS56048 China Beijing ChinaMobile
6、edgenat韩国CN2云服务器基本信息测试。KVM架构。
7、edgenat韩国CN2云服务器CPU、内存、硬盘性能测试。
8、edgenat韩国CN2云服务器UnixBench跑分测试结果。
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: 六 1月 30 2021 22:46:07 - 23:14:15
8 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 29682729.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 3725.2 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 1381.7 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 176152.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 46335.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 526524.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 267941.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 67370.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 4213.7 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 3577.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1779.2 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 260400.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 29682729.8 2543.5
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 3725.2 677.3
Execl Throughput 43.0 1381.7 321.3
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 176152.0 444.8
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 46335.6 280.0
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 526524.7 907.8
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 267941.7 215.4
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 67370.8 168.4
Process Creation 126.0 4213.7 334.4
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 3577.6 843.8
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1779.2 2965.3
System Call Overhead 15000.0 260400.3 173.6
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 512.7
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: 六 1月 30 2021 23:14:15 - 23:42:27
8 CPUs in system; running 8 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 232344001.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 29763.9 MWIPS (9.8 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 12058.5 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 345057.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 93625.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1142263.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 2113388.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 534959.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 29142.3 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 20432.0 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2807.3 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 1788691.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 232344001.9 19909.5
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 29763.9 5411.6
Execl Throughput 43.0 12058.5 2804.3
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 345057.4 871.4
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 93625.8 565.7
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1142263.5 1969.4
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2113388.5 1698.9
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 534959.5 1337.4
Process Creation 126.0 29142.3 2312.9
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 20432.0 4818.9
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2807.3 4678.9
System Call Overhead 15000.0 1788691.0 1192.5
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 2425.4
======= Script description and score comparison completed! =======
