洛杉矶Cera机房三网回程强制联通CUVIP（AS4837）线路是目前比较热门的直连大陆线路，特点是低价、大带宽、直连直连好，因此近期很多商家都上线了该线路的虚拟服务器产品。2021年3月11日创办于2019年的edgeNAT推出了该线路的最新虚拟服务器产品，全部采用KVM架构，虽然是HDD硬盘，但是有SSD缓存优化，所以读写性能并不差。edgeNAT洛杉矶Cera机房三网回程联通线路虚拟服务器特点是大带宽，最低1Gbps带宽端口起步，最高套餐可以3Gbps带宽端口、AMD Ryzen 9 3950X高性能处理器。edgeNAT洛杉矶Cera机房三网回程联通线路虚拟服务器速度及性能怎么样？博主开通了一款4核4G内存的配置，目前6折优惠是144元/月，是一个2Gbps大带宽端口套餐，下面我们一起来看看edgeNAT洛杉矶三网回程联通线路虚拟服务器测评结果，了解一下洛杉矶Cera机房三网强制联通线路怎么样！
1、edgeNAT洛杉矶三网联通云服务器最新优惠及套餐配置介绍
- 终身6折优惠码：CUVIP（限时3月21日前有效，1G内存套餐以上方案可用）
- 测试IP：156.251.191.11，http://lg.ceracuvip.edgeNAT.com/100MB.test
| CPU | 内存 | SSD | IPv4/峰值带宽/流量 | 价格 | 链接 |
| 1核 | 0.5G | 20G | 1个IP/1Gbps/1000G | 240元/年 | 点击直达 |
| 1核 | 1G | 20G | 1个IP/1Gbps/1500G | 30元/月 | 点击直达 |
| 2核 | 2G | 50G | 1个IP/2Gbps/3000G | 72元/月 | 点击直达 |
| 4核 | 4G | 100G | 1个IP/2Gbps/5000G | 144元/月 | 点击直达 |
| 6核 | 8G | 200G | 1个IP/3Gbps/10000G | 240元/月 | 点击直达 |
2、edgeNAT洛杉矶Cera三网联通VPS速度及综合性能测评
edgeNAT洛杉矶Cera机房三网联通线路三网ping测试结果。电信、联通、移动平均延迟163.9毫秒，测试时间是晚上19:30，晚高峰速度比较给力。
edgeNAT洛杉矶Cera机房三网联通线路全球节点网络抖动及丢包测试。全球所有测试节点仅有一个丢包，网络稳定性也比较不错，绿色的直线几乎所有节点都是直的。
edgeNAT洛杉矶Cera机房三网联通线路去程路由追踪测试情况。电信、联通去程169骨干直连，移动去程CMI直连。
edgeNAT洛杉矶Cera机房三网联通线路三网回程路由追踪测试。电信、联通、移动三网回程都强制走AS4837，均为联通线路回程直连没有错。
Traceroute to China, Beijing CU (TCP Mode, Max 30 Hop) ============================================================ traceroute to 123.125.99.1 (123.125.99.1), 30 hops max, 32 byte packets 1 198.16.50.145 0.73 ms AS40065 United States, California, Los Angeles, ceranetworks.com 2 * 3 * 4 192.168.101.62 0.47 ms * LAN Address 5 * 6 23.225.225.65 164.47 ms AS40065 United States, California, Los Angeles, ceranetworks.com 7 219.158.116.233 174.49 ms AS4837 China, Shanghai, ChinaUnicom 8 219.158.113.118 164.72 ms AS4837 China, Shanghai, ChinaUnicom 9 219.158.113.105 165.54 ms AS4837 China, Shanghai, ChinaUnicom 10 219.158.6.161 206.00 ms AS4837 China, Beijing, ChinaUnicom 11 124.65.194.174 203.72 ms AS4808 China, Beijing, ChinaUnicom 12 125.33.187.218 210.39 ms AS4808 China, Beijing, ChinaUnicom 13 124.65.194.134 203.20 ms AS4808 China, Beijing, ChinaUnicom 14 61.135.113.158 203.85 ms AS4808 China, Beijing, ChinaUnicom 15 * 16 * 17 123.125.99.1 200.46 ms AS4808 China, Beijing, ChinaUnicom Traceroute to China, Beijing CT (TCP Mode, Max 30 Hop) ============================================================ traceroute to 180.149.128.1 (180.149.128.1), 30 hops max, 32 byte packets 1 198.16.50.145 0.45 ms AS40065 United States, California, Los Angeles, ceranetworks.com 2 23.224.21.60 0.40 ms AS40065 United States, California, Los Angeles, ceranetworks.com 3 192.168.101.201 1.09 ms * LAN Address 4 192.168.101.62 0.53 ms * LAN Address 5 * 6 23.225.225.65 168.46 ms AS40065 United States, California, Los Angeles, ceranetworks.com 7 219.158.97.177 166.96 ms AS4837 China, Shanghai, ChinaUnicom 8 219.158.19.86 167.49 ms AS4837 China, Shanghai, ChinaUnicom 9 219.158.19.69 162.96 ms AS4837 China, Shanghai, ChinaUnicom 10 219.158.7.229 192.24 ms AS4837 China, Beijing, ChinaUnicom 11 219.158.3.6 194.63 ms AS4837 China, Beijing, ChinaUnicom 12 * 13 * 14 * 15 180.149.128.1 173.40 ms AS23724 China, Beijing, ChinaTelecom Traceroute to China, Beijing CM (TCP Mode, Max 30 Hop) ============================================================ traceroute to 211.136.25.153 (211.136.25.153), 30 hops max, 32 byte packets 1 198.16.50.145 0.51 ms AS40065 United States, California, Los Angeles, ceranetworks.com 2 * 3 192.168.101.201 0.85 ms * LAN Address 4 192.168.101.62 0.84 ms * LAN Address 5 * 6 23.225.225.65 166.32 ms AS40065 United States, California, Los Angeles, ceranetworks.com 7 219.158.116.245 135.19 ms AS4837 China, Shanghai, ChinaUnicom 8 219.158.113.142 151.83 ms AS4837 China, Shanghai, ChinaUnicom 9 219.158.113.105 135.00 ms AS4837 China, Shanghai, ChinaUnicom 10 219.158.6.169 177.39 ms AS4837 China, Beijing, ChinaUnicom 11 219.158.5.130 175.63 ms AS4837 China, Beijing, ChinaUnicom 12 * 13 221.176.15.177 172.18 ms AS9808 China, Beijing, ChinaMobile 14 * 15 * 16 * 17 211.136.63.66 175.37 ms AS56048 China, Beijing, ChinaMobile 18 211.136.95.226 171.97 ms AS56048 China, Beijing, ChinaMobile 19 211.136.95.226 172.01 ms AS56048 China, Beijing, ChinaMobile 20 * 21 * 22 211.136.25.153 176.52 ms AS56048 China, Beijing, ChinaMobile
edgeNAT洛杉矶Cera机房三网联通线路上行、下行带宽速度测试。电信、联通、移动三网基本都跑到了400Mbps以上的上行、下行最高跑到了1.5Gbps，均为晚上19:30测试的结果哦，表现较为不错。
换个测速脚本看看，有效的测试节点基本都是跑满500Mbps-600Mbps！
-> Speedtest.net Network Speed Test Node Name Upload Speed Download Speed Ping Latency Server Name Speedtest Default 31.42 MB/s 121.47 MB/s 289.48 ms MTN SA (South Africa Johannesburg) China, Nanjing CU 63.28 MB/s 139.36 MB/s 145.36 ms China Unicom (China Nanjing) China, Shanghai CU 64.19 MB/s 155.15 MB/s 148.09 ms China Unicom 5G (China ShangHai) China, Hangzhou CT 25.69 MB/s 17.55 MB/s 187.88 ms China Telecom ZheJiang Branch (China Hangzhou) China, Nanjing CT 64.17 MB/s 172.31 MB/s 154.25 ms China Telecom JiangSu 5G (China Nanjing) China, Guangzhou CT 7.93 MB/s 92.06 MB/s 174.17 ms ChinaTelecom 5G (China Guangzhou) China, Wuhan CT 31.48 MB/s 61.16 MB/s 159.41 ms China Telecom Wuhan Branch (China Wuhan) China, Shenyang CM Fail: Timeout Exceeded after 60 seconds China, Hangzhou CM 42.91 MB/s 211.98 MB/s 168.23 ms China Mobile Group Zhejiang Co.,Ltd (China Hangzhou) China, Nanning CM 50.24 MB/s 160.38 MB/s 186.79 ms GX ChinaMobile (China Nanning) China, Lanzhou CM 48.02 MB/s 170.49 MB/s 185.13 ms Lanzhou,China Mobile,Gansu (China Lanzhou) Hong Kong, CSL 49.56 MB/s 7.97 MB/s 154.68 ms CSL (Hong Kong Kwai Chung) Hong Kong, PCCW 60.56 MB/s 134.54 MB/s 155.80 ms STC (China Hong Kong) Korea, South Korea 49.00 MB/s 64.77 MB/s 141.94 ms kdatacenter.com (South Korea Seoul) Japan, GLBB 89.72 MB/s 76.64 MB/s 108.04 ms Allied Telesis Capital Corporation (Japan Fussa-shi) Taiwan, FET Fail: Timeout Exceeded after 60 seconds Taiwan, Chief 69.04 MB/s 171.51 MB/s 142.41 ms Chief Telecom (Taiwan Taoyuan) Taiwan, TWM 70.31 MB/s 227.84 MB/s 133.52 ms Taiwan Mobile (Taiwan Taoyuan) Singapore, Singtel 48.89 MB/s 163.15 MB/s 181.58 ms Singtel (Singapore Singapore) Singapore, M1 49.85 MB/s 106.90 MB/s 162.74 ms M1 Limited (Republic of Singapore Singapore) Singapore, NME 48.84 MB/s 42.25 MB/s 176.15 ms NewMedia Express (Republic of Singapore Singapore) USA, Century Link 255.78 MB/s 235.45 MB/s 25.22 ms CenturyLink (United States Seattle, WA)
接下来在看看国际节点的测速结果。总体来说对北美速度是较为不错的，晚高峰基本都能跑带300Mbps以上，其次欧洲、亚太也还可以，基本能在100Mbps以上。
## North America Speedtest【北美测速度结果】 Softlayer, Washington, USA : 4.63 MiB/s | 37.06 Mbps | ping 55.431ms SoftLayer, San Jose, USA : 20.45 MiB/s | 163.58 Mbps | ping 9.291ms SoftLayer, Dallas, USA : 0 B/s | N/A | ping error! Vultr, New Jersey, USA : 29.54 MiB/s | 236.35 Mbps | ping 66.077ms Vultr, Chicago, USA : 37.99 MiB/s | 303.90 Mbps | ping 57.374ms Vultr, Atlanta, USA : 44.75 MiB/s | 357.96 Mbps | ping 49.065ms Vultr, Miami, USA : 29.88 MiB/s | 239.08 Mbps | ping 61.847ms Vultr, Dallas, USA : 66.18 MiB/s | 529.40 Mbps | ping 33.650ms Vultr, Seattle, USA : 71.10 MiB/s | 568.76 Mbps | ping 29.381ms Vultr, Los Angeles, USA : 185.24 MiB/s | 1481.94 Mbps | ping 0.396ms Vultr, Silicon Valley, USA : 169.00 MiB/s | 1352.02 Mbps | ping 7.482ms Vultr, New York, USA : 30.28 MiB/s | 242.24 Mbps | ping 66.500ms Linode, fremont, USA : 59.91 MiB/s | 479.31 Mbps | ping 11.657ms Linode, atlanta, USA : 11.41 MiB/s | 91.25 Mbps | ping 46.226ms Linode, dallas, USA : 4.80 MiB/s | 38.42 Mbps | ping 35.909ms Linode, newark, USA : 7.62 MiB/s | 60.93 Mbps | ping 69.349ms Linode, toronto, Canada : 26.82 MiB/s | 214.53 Mbps | ping 65.792ms Ramnode, New York, USA : 5.08 MiB/s | 40.62 Mbps | ping 60.019ms Ramnode, Atlanta, USA : 6.34 MiB/s | 50.75 Mbps | ping 43.406ms OVH, Beauharnois, Canada : 0 B/s | N/A | ping 72.136ms Vultr, Toronto, Canada : 34.12 MiB/s | 272.99 Mbps | ping 63.508ms ## Europe Speedtest【欧洲测速度结果】 Vultr, London, UK : 13.18 MiB/s | 105.45 Mbps | ping 136.805ms Vultr, Frankfurt, DE : 10.15 MiB/s | 81.19 Mbps | ping 149.245ms Vultr, Paris, France : 11.82 MiB/s | 94.57 Mbps | ping 140.890ms Vultr, Amsterdam, NL : 12.04 MiB/s | 96.35 Mbps | ping 132.675ms Vultr, London, UK : 11.67 MiB/s | 93.35 Mbps | ping 136.780ms Linode, london, UK : 14.40 MiB/s | 115.17 Mbps | ping 139.415ms Linode, frankfurt, DE : 11.95 MiB/s | 95.59 Mbps | ping 137.672ms Linode, frankfurt, DE : 5.33 MiB/s | 42.60 Mbps | ping 137.734ms LeaseWeb, Frankfurt, Germany : 12.13 MiB/s | 97.06 Mbps | ping 146.691ms Hetzner, Germany : 9.19 MiB/s | 73.51 Mbps | ping 146.149ms Ramnode, Alblasserdam, NL : 2.69 MiB/s | 21.49 Mbps | ping 138.807ms EDIS, Stockholm, Sweden : 324 B/s | N/A | ping 154.861ms OVH, Roubaix, France : 2.70 MiB/s | 21.63 Mbps | ping 135.035ms Online, France : 13.51 MiB/s | 108.09 Mbps | ping 138.535ms Prometeus, Milan, Italy : 598 B/s | N/A | ping 151.496ms ## Exotic Speedtest【其他地区测速度结果】 Vultr, Sydney, Australia : 11.45 MiB/s | 91.57 Mbps | ping 147.607ms Linode, Sydney, Australia : 10.36 MiB/s | 82.87 Mbps | ping 165.642ms Sydney, Australia : 11.13 MiB/s | 89.01 Mbps | ping 147.663ms Lagoon, New Caledonia : 583 B/s | N/A | ping 169.141ms Hosteasy, Moldova : 3.89 MiB/s | 31.13 Mbps | ping 177.713ms Prima, Argentina : 491.53 KiB/s | 3.84 Mbps | ping error! ## Asia Speedtest【亚太测速度结果】 SoftLayer, Singapore : 1.73 MiB/s | 13.85 Mbps | ping 172.671ms Linode, Tokyo, Japan : 16.38 MiB/s | 131.01 Mbps | ping 115.719ms Linode, Singapore : 8.44 MiB/s | 67.48 Mbps | ping 173.829ms Linode, mumbai1, India : 5.43 MiB/s | 43.46 Mbps | ping 231.650ms Vultr, Tokyo, Japan : 17.66 MiB/s | 141.27 Mbps | ping 116.735ms Vultr, Seoul : 12.57 MiB/s | 100.60 Mbps | ping 145.003ms Vultr, Singapore : 8.26 MiB/s | 66.10 Mbps | ping 176.628ms
edgeNAT洛杉矶Cera机房三网联通虚拟服务器基本信息测试。AMD Ryzen 9 3950X处理器，KVM架构
edgeNAT洛杉矶Cera机房三网联通虚拟服务器IP解锁流媒体情况测试。
edgeNAT洛杉矶Cera机房三网联通虚拟服务器基本性能测试。SSD优化的HDD硬盘读写速度表现还算可以。
edgeNAT洛杉矶Cera机房三网联通虚拟服务器UnixBench跑分测试结果。5258.8分是非常给力的结果了。
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: 四 3月 11 2021 19:59:02 - 20:30:01
4 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 50888909.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 2766.6 MWIPS (27.5 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 7779.0 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1645832.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 422338.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 4483346.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 2638199.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 125940.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 21925.9 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 7280.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 3629.8 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 3101734.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 50888909.1 4360.7
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2766.6 503.0
Execl Throughput 43.0 7779.0 1809.1
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1645832.1 4156.1
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 422338.3 2551.9
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 4483346.5 7729.9
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2638199.3 2120.7
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 125940.2 314.9
Process Creation 126.0 21925.9 1740.2
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 7280.6 1717.1
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 3629.8 6049.7
System Call Overhead 15000.0 3101734.6 2067.8
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 2117.4
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: 四 3月 11 2021 20:30:01 - 21:00:50
4 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 192503613.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 11068.9 MWIPS (26.5 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 22228.9 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1388954.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 365802.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5058717.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 9999279.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 1157303.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 64459.8 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 30716.3 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 4479.7 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 8985245.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 192503613.8 16495.6
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 11068.9 2012.5
Execl Throughput 43.0 22228.9 5169.5
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1388954.8 3507.5
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 365802.2 2210.3
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 5058717.7 8721.9
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 9999279.4 8038.0
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 1157303.6 2893.3
Process Creation 126.0 64459.8 5115.9
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 30716.3 7244.4
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 4479.7 7466.2
System Call Overhead 15000.0 8985245.5 5990.2
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 5258.8
======= Script description and score comparison completed! =======
