美国西部沿海到大陆目前性价比最高的线路要数三网回程联通CUVIP线路，因为此线路目前相对CN2 GIA来说价格更为便宜，因此洛杉矶三网回程联通9929线路具有大带宽、低延迟、低价格的特点！所以近期很多商家主推此线路产品。前面博主在HostKvm新上洛杉矶联通优化VPS(1核1G内存折后$5/月)文章当中介绍了2013年成立于的老商家HostKvm新上线的洛杉矶三网回程联通优化线路VPS，1核1G内存配置折后是$5.2/月，分配100Mbps带宽端口，500GB月流量！HostKvm运营时间比较长，旗下虚拟服务器承诺硬件资源不超售，属于相对靠谱商家，因此1核1G内存配置轻量建站是可以满足的！
HostKvm洛杉矶三网联通VPS怎么样，洛杉矶三网回程联通9929线路怎么样？博主开通了HostKvm洛杉矶三网回程联通优化线路的套餐，此文章当中记录了HostKvm洛杉矶三网回程联通优化VPS速度及综合性能测评结果，有需求的可以查看下面详细内容。
一、HostKvm洛杉矶三网联通VPS套餐整理
HostKvm洛杉矶三网联通优化线路VPS目前仅有下面一个套餐，如果有洛杉矶CN2 GIA线路VPS需求，可以查看此文章：HostKvm新上洛杉矶联通优化VPS(1核1G内存折后$5/月)，里面有HostKvm洛杉矶VPS的全部套餐介绍。
- 美国洛杉矶B区测试IP：usku.speedtest.hostkvm.com（联通优化线路）
|
二、HostKvm洛杉矶三网回程联通优化VPS网络速度及综合性能测评
1、HostKvm洛杉矶三网回程联通优化VPS网络速度测评
HostKvm洛杉矶三网回程联通优化VPS全球节点ping测试结果。电信平均延迟160.6毫秒、移动平均延迟167.3毫秒、联通平均延迟151.9毫秒！
HostKvm洛杉矶三网回程联通优化VPS全球节点丢包及网络抖动情况测试。从测试结果来看只有三个节点有丢包情况，网络抖动情况时比较小的，几乎是没有异常波动。
HostKvm洛杉矶三网回程联通优化VPS三网去程路由追踪测试。电信163直连、移动CMI直连、联通9929直连。
HostKvm洛杉矶三网回程联通优化VPS电信联通移动三网回程路由追踪测试。电信、联通、移动三网回程都走联通AS9929！
Traceroute to China, Beijing CU (TCP Mode, Max 30 Hop) ============================================================ traceroute to 123.125.99.1 (123.125.99.1), 30 hops max, 32 byte packets 1 192.168.255.244 11.76 ms * LAN Address 2 192.168.222.252 11.67 ms * LAN Address 3 192.168.222.254 0.79 ms * LAN Address 4 162.219.85.241 1.27 ms AS10099 China, Hong Kong, ChinaUnicom 5 203.160.75.218 129.09 ms AS10099 China, Hong Kong, ChinaUnicom 6 218.105.2.93 129.54 ms AS9929 China, ChinaUnicom 7 218.105.131.101 149.76 ms AS9929 China, ChinaUnicom 8 210.78.28.70 150.58 ms * China, ChinaUnicom 9 219.158.35.45 151.12 ms AS4837 China, ChinaUnicom 10 219.158.5.129 152.75 ms AS4837 China, ChinaUnicom 11 * 12 125.33.187.126 153.71 ms AS4808 China, Beijing, ChinaUnicom 13 124.65.194.42 150.82 ms AS4808 China, Beijing, ChinaUnicom 14 61.135.113.154 152.00 ms AS4808 China, Beijing, ChinaUnicom 15 * 16 * 17 123.125.99.1 152.14 ms AS4808 China, Beijing, ChinaUnicom Traceroute to China, Beijing CT (TCP Mode, Max 30 Hop) ============================================================ traceroute to 180.149.128.1 (180.149.128.1), 30 hops max, 32 byte packets 1 192.168.255.244 12.48 ms * LAN Address 2 192.168.222.252 11.82 ms * LAN Address 3 192.168.222.254 0.55 ms * LAN Address 4 162.219.85.241 1.10 ms AS10099 China, Hong Kong, ChinaUnicom 5 203.160.75.218 130.39 ms AS10099 China, Hong Kong, ChinaUnicom 6 218.105.2.201 129.85 ms AS9929 China, ChinaUnicom 7 218.105.131.125 151.11 ms AS9929 China, ChinaUnicom 8 210.78.28.82 151.58 ms * China, ChinaUnicom 9 202.97.16.61 151.44 ms AS4134 China, ChinaTelecom 10 * 11 36.110.246.146 154.81 ms AS23724 China, Beijing, ChinaTelecom 12 180.149.128.1 156.22 ms AS23724 China, Beijing, ChinaTelecom Traceroute to China, Beijing CM (TCP Mode, Max 30 Hop) ============================================================ traceroute to 211.136.25.153 (211.136.25.153), 30 hops max, 32 byte packets 1 192.168.255.244 15.37 ms * LAN Address 2 192.168.222.252 10.21 ms * LAN Address 3 192.168.222.254 0.53 ms * LAN Address 4 162.219.85.241 1.15 ms AS10099 China, Hong Kong, ChinaUnicom 5 203.160.75.218 130.59 ms AS10099 China, Hong Kong, ChinaUnicom 6 218.105.2.93 133.44 ms AS9929 China, ChinaUnicom 7 218.105.131.101 149.46 ms AS9929 China, ChinaUnicom 8 210.78.28.74 150.55 ms * China, ChinaUnicom 9 219.158.35.17 151.57 ms AS4837 China, ChinaUnicom 10 * 11 221.183.25.53 164.87 ms AS9808 China, ChinaMobile 12 * 13 * 14 * 15 211.136.63.66 173.80 ms AS56048 China, Beijing, ChinaMobile 16 211.136.67.166 172.21 ms AS56048 China, Beijing, ChinaMobile 17 211.136.95.226 186.86 ms AS56048 China, Beijing, ChinaMobile 18 * 19 211.136.25.153 168.43 ms AS56048 China, Beijing, ChinaMobile
HostKvm洛杉矶三网回程联通优化VPS电信联通移动三网上行、下行速度测试。商家标注给的是100Mbps带宽端口，但是下面测试结果显示能跑到500Mbps上行、100Mbps下行。带宽端口超乎预期。
HostKvm洛杉矶三网回程联通优化VPS海外节点上行、下行带宽速度测试。美国地区差不多上下行能跑满70-90Mbps的样子。欧洲地区50-70Mbps！亚太地区70Mbps！
## North America Speedtest Softlayer, Washington, USA : 8.94 MiB/s | 71.53 Mbps | ping 62.960ms SoftLayer, San Jose, USA : 11.16 MiB/s | 89.26 Mbps | ping 11.164ms SoftLayer, Dallas, USA : 0 B/s | N/A | ping error! Vultr, New Jersey, USA : 8.91 MiB/s | 71.27 Mbps | ping 68.521ms Vultr, Chicago, USA : 9.34 MiB/s | 74.73 Mbps | ping 56.377ms Vultr, Atlanta, USA : 9.49 MiB/s | 75.89 Mbps | ping 50.742ms Vultr, Miami, USA : 9.07 MiB/s | 72.58 Mbps | ping 64.897ms Vultr, Dallas, USA : 10.01 MiB/s | 80.05 Mbps | ping 36.601ms Vultr, Seattle, USA : 10.20 MiB/s | 81.64 Mbps | ping 30.994ms Vultr, Los Angeles, USA : 10.92 MiB/s | 87.33 Mbps | ping 1.678ms Vultr, Silicon Valley, USA : 10.66 MiB/s | 85.30 Mbps | ping 13.322ms Vultr, New York, USA : 8.88 MiB/s | 71.07 Mbps | ping 68.532ms Linode, fremont, USA : 11.12 MiB/s | 88.99 Mbps | ping 14.159ms Linode, atlanta, USA : 8.03 MiB/s | 64.27 Mbps | ping 50.454ms Linode, dallas, USA : 10.01 MiB/s | 80.09 Mbps | ping 42.194ms Linode, newark, USA : 10.06 MiB/s | 80.48 Mbps | ping 67.967ms Linode, toronto, Canada : 4.13 MiB/s | 33.08 Mbps | ping 70.440ms Ramnode, New York, USA : 9.87 MiB/s | 78.93 Mbps | ping 65.920ms Ramnode, Atlanta, USA : 9.96 MiB/s | 79.70 Mbps | ping 48.687ms OVH, Beauharnois, Canada : 0 B/s | N/A | ping 78.575ms Vultr, Toronto, Canada : 8.97 MiB/s | 71.72 Mbps | ping 68.372ms ## Europe Speedtest Vultr, London, UK : 6.15 MiB/s | 49.23 Mbps | ping 133.364ms Vultr, Frankfurt, DE : 5.36 MiB/s | 42.85 Mbps | ping 152.075ms Vultr, Paris, France : 5.56 MiB/s | 44.45 Mbps | ping 142.150ms Vultr, Amsterdam, NL : 5.34 MiB/s | 42.69 Mbps | ping 147.222ms Vultr, London, UK : 6.25 MiB/s | 50.00 Mbps | ping 133.227ms Linode, london, UK : 7.53 MiB/s | 60.20 Mbps | ping 135.081ms Linode, frankfurt, DE : 6.33 MiB/s | 50.61 Mbps | ping 152.192ms Linode, frankfurt, DE : 6.42 MiB/s | 51.34 Mbps | ping 151.864ms LeaseWeb, Frankfurt, Germany : 6.69 MiB/s | 53.56 Mbps | ping 150.745ms Hetzner, Germany : 3.77 MiB/s | 30.19 Mbps | ping 163.044ms Ramnode, Alblasserdam, NL : 2.42 MiB/s | 19.35 Mbps | ping 145.782ms EDIS, Stockholm, Sweden : 311 B/s | N/A | ping 167.694ms OVH, Roubaix, France : 5.22 MiB/s | 41.76 Mbps | ping 156.406ms Online, France : 6.51 MiB/s | 52.04 Mbps | ping 142.440ms Prometeus, Milan, Italy : 595 B/s | N/A | ping 170.865ms ## Exotic Speedtest Vultr, Sydney, Australia : 4.71 MiB/s | 37.69 Mbps | ping 210.015ms Linode, Sydney, Australia : 3.57 MiB/s | 28.56 Mbps | ping 137.752ms Sydney, Australia : 4.72 MiB/s | 37.76 Mbps | ping 210.593ms Lagoon, New Caledonia : 517 B/s | N/A | ping 172.924ms Hosteasy, Moldova : 3.07 MiB/s | 24.58 Mbps | ping 187.287ms Prima, Argentina : 1.75 MiB/s | 13.96 Mbps | ping error! ## Asia Speedtest SoftLayer, Singapore : 2.77 MiB/s | 22.15 Mbps | ping 165.438ms Linode, Tokyo, Japan : 7.82 MiB/s | 62.55 Mbps | ping 113.599ms Linode, Singapore : 4.21 MiB/s | 33.71 Mbps | ping 194.876ms Linode, mumbai1, India : 0.98 MiB/s | 7.85 Mbps | ping 245.729ms Vultr, Tokyo, Japan : 7.04 MiB/s | 56.29 Mbps | ping 115.539ms Vultr, Seoul : 4.72 MiB/s | 37.76 Mbps | ping 165.998ms Vultr, Singapore : 4.46 MiB/s | 35.68 Mbps | ping 173.671ms
2、HostKvm洛杉矶三网回程联通优化VPS综合性能测试。
HostKvm洛杉矶三网回程联通优化VPS基本信息及硬盘读写速度测试结果。E5-2678 v3处理器、KVM架构，硬盘读写速度比较给力。
HostKvm洛杉矶三网回程联通优化VPS解锁流媒体测试结果。博主开通的是意大利原生IP，支持解锁意大利区Netflix！但是商家并没有做任何保证。
HostKvm洛杉矶三网回程联通优化VPS的CPU、内存及硬盘性能测试。
HostKvm洛杉矶三网回程联通优化VPS采用UnixBench跑分测试结果如下：
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: 六 3月 13 2021 12:56:07 - 13:24:11
2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 37205759.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 4536.1 MWIPS (9.7 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 3621.3 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 550171.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 141748.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1913101.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 793501.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 171707.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 7436.2 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 6118.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1284.3 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 524377.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 37205759.3 3188.2
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 4536.1 824.7
Execl Throughput 43.0 3621.3 842.2
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 550171.1 1389.3
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 141748.7 856.5
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1913101.1 3298.5
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 793501.4 637.9
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 171707.5 429.3
Process Creation 126.0 7436.2 590.2
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 6118.6 1443.1
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1284.3 2140.5
System Call Overhead 15000.0 524377.9 349.6
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1035.3
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: 六 3月 13 2021 13:24:11 - 13:52:22
2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 71215893.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 9023.0 MWIPS (9.7 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 6788.9 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 869643.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 229473.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2780975.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 1492056.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 329792.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 11979.4 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 9682.2 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1337.5 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 937627.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 71215893.1 6102.5
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 9023.0 1640.5
Execl Throughput 43.0 6788.9 1578.8
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 869643.9 2196.1
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 229473.7 1386.5
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2780975.9 4794.8
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1492056.0 1199.4
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 329792.0 824.5
Process Creation 126.0 11979.4 950.7
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 9682.2 2283.5
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1337.5 2229.2
System Call Overhead 15000.0 937627.8 625.1
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1724.2
======= Script description and score comparison completed! =======
